Pushing for open data that makes a difference, Sunlight Foundation publishes tactical guide
September 19, 2017
A lot of cities publish data, but not in ways that matter to the people, the group says.
As drone adoption accelerates, government must contend with a long checklist of privacy, security and safety concerns, a new report from the Cloud Security Alliance says.
Colin Wood is the managing editor of StateScoop. Before that, he was a staff writer for Government Technology magazine. Before that, he taught Engl...
Unsecure software, shared airspace, a lack of standardization and disgruntled citizens — cities have a host of challenges to consider as municipal drone programs grow near, according to a security report released Thursday.
The report — called Establishing a Safe and Secure Municipal Drone Program — was published by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) and Securing Smart Cities nonprofit as a resource for urban leaders evaluating the challenges, threats and privacy considerations of municipal drone programs.
The CSA report concludes that drones will play a key role in the future of smart cities — from medicine and transport to agriculture and law enforcement — and so cities and vendors need to develop drone platforms that are both reliable and secure if the technology is to meet its potential. Security threats abound.
Drone adoption is increasing, with more than 2.6 million commercial drones projected to be shipped by 2025, according to research and consulting firm Tractica. Seattle issued an RFI including possible drone use on Monday, as the city looks for new technologies and partnerships to drive broadband availability and combat the city's digital divide. In the private sector, delivery drone company Starship Technologies reported $17.2 million in new investor funding in January as it offers its land-based drone services in 10 American cities.
Key challenges in municipal drone adoption identified by the report include:
Privacy considerations highlighted by the report include that drones can include facial recognition capabilities that track members of the public, audio and video monitoring that could eavesdrop on people, and sensors that could identify people and objects even behind walls. All of these technologies, the report notes, could be abused or hijacked.
A table of possible threats to drone systems included in the report illustrates that variety of challenges technology leaders will face in adoption, including "privacy zealots," weak encryption, and spoofed GPS signals. Outcomes from these threats range from temporary service disruption to the drone turning against cities and their inhabitants to serve its hijackers.
The report recommends leaders build strong governance and policy frameworks to help contend with these many challenges. A configuration control board (CCB) is noted as one of "the best" ways to ensure high level policy frameworks are followed.
The full 29-page report — Establishing a Safe and Secure Municipal Drone Program — can be downloaded from CSA, here.